Taken at the Center for Civil & Human Rights in Atlanta: One Week Before MLK Day |
In chapter 6, he speaks of a low-information diet. He makes some very valid points, one of which was retention. When most of us read the entire book, or the entire article in a news source versus the headline and some highlights, we can't regurgitate or retain much of anything past the headline and highlights anyway. So why bother? I agree with that to some extent.
In chapter 7, he talks about how he never accepted anything less than an A in college and his technique for doing so. It involved taking whatever paper that had a grade lower than an A to the professor/instructor/grader with hours worth of questions for two purposes.
- To get every last detail about how papers were graded, down to the grader's pet peeves and prejudices.
- To instill a standard that this would happen every time the grader assigned something lower than an A.
Back to the low information diet. I did this for a while, ignoring the news. Letting the news come to me was refreshing. If something was important for me to know, I waited for someone else to tell me.
I noticed that I cannot be a good citizen, nor can I make the contributions that are part of my philosophy without informing myself of the current events. Granted, I use the spirit of his idea, and keep my reading of current events to a bare minimum, but I want to be up to speed. I want to be able to discuss them with people, and not just get the word from them. I want to be the progress I want to see in the world. In order to do that, I need to keep informed.
Contribution to society may not be part of your philosophy, and perhaps this isn't as important to you. If that is the case, a low information diet is just fine for you. Indeed, it is blissful. Ignorance is bliss.
But I despise ignorance. So, a low information diet doesn't work for me.
Great post! I maintain a low information diet but share your concern about being a good citizen. Cal Newport recently wrote a great blog post about this very thing (the relevant section has the header "Case Study: Supporting a Desire to Stay Informed About Politics").
ReplyDeleteI'll need to check that out. Thanks for the tip on Newport's blog post.
DeleteHoly crap! I just read that post, and he explained almost exactly what I do!
DeleteI have New York Times (Morning Briefing) and the Wall Street Journal (10-Point) delivered to my mailbox each business day, "dive into [their] political thinking, notice the fundamental disagreements; build familiarity with the major streams of contemporary ideological thinking, etc."
That's awesome! Great minds think alike, obviously.
Delete